The purpose of this page is to present, for your edification
and possible use, factual information and opinions on various
topics deemed relevant to the times in which we live.
NARPI takes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information
contained in the articles; the opinions expressed by the featured
writers are wholly their own and should not be ascribed to the
NARPI leadership or the Website Coordinator.
PLEASE NOTE: If you would prefer to download and print any
article appearing on this page so that you might then be able
to read it at your leisure, simply
CLICK HERE.
When asked, choose to save the article to your desktop or other
preferred location. Then open it, using your computer’s word
processing program. Of course, if you prefer, you can open the
article by choosing that option when presented.
Ageism said to erode care given to elders
By Alice Dembner
March 7, 2005
Older patients often suffer needlessly from cancer, depression,
and heart disease because society's age bias gets in the way
of treatment, according to a growing body of research.
Patients over 65 typically get less aggressive treatment for
cancer than younger patients, less preventive care for high
blood pressure and cholesterol, and double the dose they
need of some psychiatric medicines, studies show.
While they represent the majority of patients with chronic
illnesses and the major users of prescription drugs, they
are frequently passed over for tests of new treatments and
medicines, leaving doctors with little of the evidence they
need to care for seniors properly.
''There is a persistent bias . . . that works against the
best interests of older Americans," said Daniel Perry,
executive director of the Alliance for Aging Research, a
nonprofit based in Washington that advocates for
improvements in the health of aging Americans.
Doctors and advocates are struggling to chip away at the
ageism, which they said often springs from misguided
attempts to protect seniors from being harmed by overly
aggressive treatments. In the latest volley, published
last week in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, University of Vermont researchers showed
that aggressive chemotherapy reduced deaths from breast
cancer and recurrences in women over 65 as much as in
younger women. Age alone should not rule doctors' and
patients' decisions about cancer treatment, the
researchers said.
Earlier studies of breast cancer treatment showed that
many older women are not getting standard treatment,
including life-saving chemotherapy. In fact, one study
found that women over 65 with breast cancer that
hadn't spread, and whose tumors didn't respond to
antiestrogen therapy, were seven times less likely
than younger women to get chemotherapy.
The researchers, from Ohio State University, controlled
for factors such as the size of tumors and stage of
cancer, and concluded that age bias was a major
factor.
The problem is not limited to women. About half of all
seniors with advanced colon cancer don't get chemotherapy
after surgery to remove the tumor, although older
patients who get the treatment live longer, according to
researchers at Columbia University.
''Many older patients are not getting the optimal therapy
for their cancer," said Dr. Edward Trimble, who
heads efforts at the National Cancer Institute to improve
cancer care for the elderly. ''Bias is part of
it."
Other factors, he said, are real concerns about the ability
of frail seniors or those with multiple illnesses to
tolerate aggressive treatments. But those decisions should
be made on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the
patient, he and other doctors said, and not decided
based on myths about what an ''average" old person
can tolerate.
''Many physicians who take care of older people have
not gotten the message that your chronological age is
not your biological age," said Dr. Tamara Harris,
a senior investigator at the National Institute on Aging.
''Physicians need to take into account that being 65
doesn't mean you're close to the end of your
life."
Seniors' own internalized ageism also contributes to
undertreatment, doctors said. Older patients sometimes
dismiss health problems such as hearing loss, memory
problems, or incontinence as symptoms of old age and
don't even mention them during office visits.
Doctors are plagued by some of those same misconceptions,
according to other research. In a survey published in
the Journals of Gerontology, 35 percent of doctors
erroneously considered an increase in blood pressure
a normal process of aging.
''We've seen a dramatic underuse of cholesterol
drugs, even blood pressure drugs, in older people,"
said Dr. Jerry Avorn, a professor of medicine at Harvard
Medical School who studies use of drugs. ''The older you are,
the more likely you are to have a chronic condition untreated
with drugs."
A report by the Alliance for Aging Research found a
particular problem in psychiatric care, suggesting that ''too
many physicians and psychologists believe that late-stage
depression and suicidal statements are normal and
acceptable in older patients."
The suicide rate among older Americans is four times the
national average, and 39 percent of older adults who
commit suicide had been seen by their primary care
physician in the previous week, according to the
Alliance.
Many older patients also don't get screening and
treatments to prevent disease. The federal Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention reported in 2004 that six
in 10 older adults hadn't gotten all recomended preventive
services, including screening for common cancers and
vaccines for flu and pneumonia. Seniors don't regularly get
bone density tests either, although the tests can help
assess risk for osteoporosis and fractures.
In some cases, the problem is at the other extreme --
seniors are overmedicated because doctors don't know
the optimal dose. Many drugs have not been studied
extensively in the elderly, who typically metabolize
drugs differently from younger people.
The US Food and Drug Administration recommends, but
does not require, drugs to be tested in the
elderly.
A study of schizophrenia drugs in late 2003 found that
seniors did well on about half the dose given to
younger patients. The problem of overdosing is compounded,
Avorn said, because some doctors dismiss symptoms of
drug side effects, such as confusion or tiredness, as
signs of aging.
Seniors have often been excluded from tests of new
treatments for many of the illnesses that are most
common among those over 65. For example, the Vermont
doctors who analyzed research on breast cancer found
that only 8 percent of the 6,487 women in four large
studies were over 65, despite the fact that about 50
percent of all new breast cancer cases are diagnosed
in older women.
''A lot of older people are shortchanged," said
Dr. Hyman Muss, a professor of medicine at the Vermont
Cancer Center at the University of Vermont College of
Medicine.
The Food and Drug Administration, in fact, found that
seniors represented about 36 percent of patients in
clinical trials for six of the most deadly cancers,
despite the fact that seniors account for 60 percent
of the cases of cancer of the breast, lung, colon,
pancreas, ovaries, and blood.
The gap is largely due to the failure of physicians
to ask seniors to participate, according to a study
by New York researchers. In addition, some seniors
are excluded because of complicating illnesses,
while others choose not to participate.
This contributes to a vicious cycle, Avorn noted.
''They get kept out of the studies and then people
deny them the drugs because there's no evidence
they work in the elderly," he said.
Change has begun, however.
The National Institute on Aging and the National
Cancer Institute are spending millions of dollars on
studies of disease and treatments in seniors.
Doctors' organizations are inviting Muss and other
researchers who study age bias to speak about their
results.
Medical schools are incorporating more teaching about
geriatric care into the curriculum. Medicare is paying
for more preventive care, and beginning to pay doctors
on the basis of the quality of care provided to
seniors.
But Perry, of the Alliance, suggests that the biggest
push for equality in care will come as the baby boomers
turn 65 in the next few years.
''Ageism in healthcare is still an underrecognized
problem," he said. ''Reform will only come when
the consumers of healthcare start demanding that their
health needs are met with some urgency."
© Copyright 2005 Globe Newspaper Company.